No surprise, then, that the book includes a lengthy discussion of stack sizes, which "are critical to most no-limit decisions." Stack size effectively determines your risk/reward possibilities, and that idea prompts a long and very valuable analysis of "commitment." "'Am I committed?' is the first question you should ask yourself on every street," write Flynn, Mehta, and Miller. And that makes the analytical aspects of no-limit hold'em a lot more complicated. In limit, you're playing for one or two or three more bets in no-limit, your entire stack may be on the line in every hand. But the most consistent winners use analytical skill to complement their decision making, and in no-limit hold'em, the math is a lot more difficult than it is in the limit game. Feel and aggression are critical to success in no-limit hold'em. ![]() "It's the thousands of small strategic decisions that the pros get right and the amateurs don't."ĭon't misunderstand. ![]() "It's not the one gut-wrenching decision for all the chips that counts most," the authors write. ![]() I review poker books for Card Player magazine, and here's the piece I submitted about this excellent new book from Two Plus Two (in its November 7 issue):Ī lot of amateur players seem to believe that no-limit hold'em is a game dominated by feel and aggression instead of mathematical rigor and brutal rationality, but this powerful new book dispels that notion in no uncertain terms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |